Home arrow News arrow Schools will get money, but can't keep it all

buy software
Schools will get money, but can't keep it all PDF Print E-mail

The Galax Gazette
By BEN BOMBERGER
Published 05-19-2009

INDEPENDENCE — After months of meetings and talks between the Grayson Board of Supervisors and county school board, the school division may get exactly what it requested for the 2009-10 budget. 

But, additional cuts may still be needed.

The school board submitted a request to the supervisors for level funding — no increase or decrease — for the 2009-10 school budget, in the amount of $4.65 million.

In the past several months, the amount supervisors expected to provide has ranged anywhere from $3.9 million — the minimum required to get full state funding — to the entire $4.65 million. 

Now, the supervisors are looking at giving the school system $4.61 million, with only one cut — taking $41,500 out of the school board's budget to pay for a school resource officer and placing that cost in the sheriff's budget.

This would essentially give the school system exactly what it wanted. 

There is downside to the proposal, however. The school system's $4.65 million spending plan budgeted only $377,000 to be returned to the county, the result of savings from closing two schools.

The supervisors now plan to hold the school system responsible for $634,000, a figure supervisors claim they agreed to before the long-range facilities plan was ever adopted.

In other words, the school system will get its $4.6 million, but will have to return to the county $257,000 more than it budgeted for. 

Supervisors' Chairman Mike Maynard suggested giving the school board an opportunity to return a large portion of that money in the current year's budget instead.

Maynard said if the school system could return $257,000 after next month's closeout at the end of the current fiscal year, it would not be required to come up with that money in the 2009-10 budget and would have everything it requested. 

The problem with the idea is that, if the school system gives back $257,000 at the end of this fiscal year, it could put the county's share of school spending below the required contribution to obtain full state funding.

According to numbers provided during the meeting, the school system could potentially return $180,000 this year and keep the county's share above the minimum requirement.

If the school system returns a portion of the $257,000 next month, they would only be required to provide the difference during the 2009-10 budget. 

If they return no money to the county before July 1, the entire $257,000 will be due next year.

Maynard added that the board should also look at a different way of appropriating the school's money. 

The county currently appropriates half the budget in October and the other half around May.

The board is considering appropriating the school's budget in only two categories, one that would be solely the money the school must return to the county — the $634,000 — and the other a lump sum that the school board could spend as it sees fit. 

Currently, the school budget is appropriated in seven categories.

Although supervisors left the meeting last Tuesday night declaring the expense side of the budget was complete, no decisions are final until the school board's budget is approved at a May 26 meeting, scheduled to begin at 5 p.m. with a VDOT public hearing, followed by adoption of the school board's budget. 

In other budget news, Grayson Sheriff Richard Vaughan also spoke with the board during the meeting to explain his request.

Vaughan said his budget may appear a lot larger than last year's total, but only includes an additional $45,000 in funding from the county. Of that, Vaughan said $41,500 is salary for a school resource officer, a line item that will be moved from the school board budget to the sheriff's budget. 

Vaughan said the additional couple thousand dollars were minor increases that resulted in having more deputies this year. Those increases are in education, technology, telecommunications, ammunition and travel.

Vaughan added that $36,615 had to be included in the automobile line item, as well, as the department had signed an agreement on the lease-purchase of five new Dodge Chargers last year. The agreement included three payments of $36,615. 

If the county provides no additional funding, the department would not be able to purchase any new vehicles this year.

Vaughan said the increases were offset with decreases in other areas of the budget, as well as some increases in revenue. 

The department has also provided the county with an additional $20,000 this year from the traffic fees. Vaughan asked the board to consider giving him part of that money to close the $45,000 gap, but supervisors had other ideas.

The drug forfeiture and assets account has roughly $109,000 in it, but the supervisors can't use that money in the budget. 

They could only provide the sheriff with the same amount as last year and Vaughan would have to come up with a way to pay for the additional position. One option is to request to use money from the drug fund to pay for the school resource officer position.

The county is allowed to use the fund to pay for the first year of employment. 

Vaughan noted that he would rather that money be used to increase what the department has to spend, instead of relying on it to supplement something in the budget.

The other option discussed was to take the $41,500 out of the school board's budget and place it in the sheriff's budget, essentially canceling the two figures out. 

Maynard, however, said he would rather use that $41,500 from the school's budget to close the $1.1 million gap the county is facing between its revenue and expenses and “entertain” any ideas the sheriff had to pay for the additional position.

• Supervisors will meet Tuesday at 6:30 p.m. to begin working on the revenue side of the budget.

http://www.lcni5.com/cgi-bin/c2.cgi?055+article+News+20090519165612055055010

Advertisement