Home arrow News arrow Montgomery boards talk new schools

Montgomery boards talk new schools PDF Print E-mail

The Roanoke Times

http://www.roanoke.com/news/nrv/wb/126495

Montgomery boards talk new schools

A deciding factor on what gets built first will hinge on property acquisition.

Paul Dellinger

CHRISTIANSBURG -- The Montgomery County supervisors and school board agreed at a joint meeting Tuesday night that the order in which new schools can be built will depend largely on how soon land can be acquired for them.

The plan: The board of supervisors will identify construction dollars available through future bond issues, and the school board will decide on what school projects will get that funding.

Last year, county officials estimated the cost of all needed capital projects over the next five years, including schools, would be nearly $202 million and require a 27-cent increase in the real estate tax rate.

They prioritized the needs and got the total down to $130 million, including $31.1 million for county projects and $98.9 million for schools. The projected real estate tax rate increase to cover that is 14 cents.

In December, the supervisors agreed to consider providing $98.9 million for the school work over the next five years, subject to consultation with the school board. Now, the school board must come up with the projects.

"The big thing is we need to own the property," said Assistant County Administrator Carol Edmonds.

The current plan is for the county to obtain land for new Elliston/Lafayette and Price's Fork elementary schools by the end of this year, and decide on new schools and dollars by February. A financing plan would be in place by March and bonds issued to cover them in May. County officials are in the process of buying a piece of the historic Fotheringay estate for the Elliston school.

Other planned capital projects would include school projects in Riner and Christiansburg and the air-conditioning of existing schools. If land could not be acquired for one of the early school projects, another might be moved up in the timing.

"We're going to let you know everything we know when we know it," school board member David Dunkenberger told the supervisors.

Supervisor Gary Creed worried that construction costs might escalate significantly if the first two school projects don't start soon. "I think the first one needs to be started tomorrow and I think the next one needs to be started on the following day," he said. "Don't overspend your budget ... Err on the side of caution."

School board Chairwoman Penny Franklin agreed about the rising costs. Even if the land was acquired and two schools were built in record time, she said, "there are things that are outside of our control."

Supervisors Chairman Steve Spradlin said his expectations are high, and he said he hopes the two boards can finalize an official agreement on school projects by the end of the year.

Dunkenberger and Supervisor Doug Marrs said they believe the spirit of cooperation and trust between the two boards at this point, and time will help them come to an agreement.

But several supervisors noted that the projects will mean a huge expenditure of taxpayer dollars and wanted continued joint meetings to be kept up to date to answer questions about progress from constituents.

Advertisement